MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133037957

Paired Electrolysis for Carbon Management: Pathways to Energy-Efficient CO2 Capture and Upgrade

2025· dissertation· W7133037957 on OpenAlexaff
Peihao Li

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverpotentialElectrolysisFaraday efficiencyElectrolysis of waterAnodeOxygen evolutionElectrochemistryHigh-pressure electrolysisCarbon fibers
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrolysis using renewable electricity presents the opportunity to valorize abundant feedstocks such as water and CO2. Electrochemistry enables CO2 upgrade for chemical and fuel, water electrosplitting for clean hydrogen, and CO2 capture. Each of these technologies today is, however, highly energy-intensive.In my PhD thesis, I explore paired electrolysis as a strategy to lower the energy requirements in such reactions. Paired electrolysis refers to combining a cathodic reaction (CO2 electroreduction reaction (CO2RR), hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), or atmospheric oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) for CO2 capture) with an anodic reaction that, in general, minimizes the overpotential on the anode, decreasing the voltage required compared to the traditional case of pairing with anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER). I first study the co-production of CO and acrolein, pairing acidic CO2RR to CO with allyl alcohol oxidation to acrolein. Compared to the OER-paired case, the full-cell voltage is lower by 0.7 V with 96% Faradaic efficiency (FE) of CO and 85% FE of acrolein. The system reduces energy consumption to produce 1 kg of CO by 1.6× compared to the prior acidic CO2-to-CO electrolysis systems. I next pursue carbon-negative hydrogen production via bio-derived feedstock electrosplitting: pairing HER with the oxidation of glycerol. I study the reaction pathway via Raman and density functional theory (DFT) to reduce the overpotential at the anode. I report as a result a 100-hour average full-cell voltage of 0.58 V. The system produces separated streams of H2 for use and CO2 for sequestration, with an overall energy consumption of 205 MJ/kg H2 and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of −8 kg CO2 equivalent (CO2e)/kg H2. Finally, I extend the application of oxidation of bio-derived feedstock to high-purity CO2 to non-point-source carbon management by pairing it with atmospheric ORR-driven direct air capture (DAC). In this system, atmospheric CO2 is captured and released as high-purity CO2 while bio-derived feedstocks undergo simultaneous oxidation to CO2. I report an energy consumption of 3 MJ for removing 1 kg of net CO2e. In summary, this thesis contributes to the emerging field of paired electrolysis through the examination of both systems-level and catalyst design aspects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207