MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133039899

The Sensual Body and Artistic Prowess in Netherlandish Painting ca. 1540â 1570

2016· dissertation· W7133039899 on OpenAlexafffund
Tianna Helena Uchacz

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2016
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Crisis of the 21st Century
Canadian institutionsOntario College of Art and Design
FundersFaculty of Arts and SciencesUniversity of TorontoSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversiteit Utrecht
KeywordsPaintingSubject matterVernacularObject (grammar)Subject (documents)Ideal (ethics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the middle of the sixteenth century, Netherlandish painters turned their attention toward the sensual nude. The leading contemporaries of Pieter Bruegel, including Frans Floris, Willem Key, Jan Massys, Maerten van Heemskerck, and Michiel Coxcie, favoured subjects that allowed them to elaborate their respective approaches to the ideal body. Artistsâ deliberate attention to the visual and tactile qualities of their painted figures had affective and artistic aims: painters sought to cultivate empathetic responses in their viewers while simultaneously asserting their individual brands. These artists also favoured subjects that presented the sensual nude as a problemâ an object for erotic delectation and one that could raise salient social concerns around gender, love, and coupling. An important feature of the paintings in this study is the way they orchestrate the possibility for contrasting points of view, thus complicating attempts to derive unequivocal interpretations. Indeed, contemporary rederijker drama, public festivity, vernacular literature and poetry, authoritative classical texts, and prints from across Europe suggest the range of issues that might have been projected onto Netherlandish depictions of the nude. While little is known of the patrons of such works, the scale, quality, and erudite subject matter point to a relatively affluent and educated class of individual; we know, for example, that Frans Florisâ s nudes were collected by Antoine Perrenot de Granvelle, a Habsburg official and the Bishop of Arras, and by the wealthy Antwerp financier, Nicholas Jonghelinck. Such patrons were as attracted by the visceral, affective qualities of the sensual body as they were by the opportunities it gave to display their erudition. They also valued how the leading artists adapted the fashionable formal vocabulary of antiquity and post-Raphaelesque figure painting to Netherlandish thematic demands and artistic traditions. By allowing their works to negotiate between the international and the local, Frans Floris and his contemporaries were active participants in a discourse on the sensual nude that had regional relevance and pan-European purchase. This very prominent and prestigious image category must be better integrated into art historical narratives of Netherlandish painting and Renaissance art.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicFinancial Crisis of the 21st CenturyFrench-language works237,207