MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133046342

Searching for Beyond the Standard Model Phenomena in Dijet Events with at Least One Lepton with the ATLAS Detector

2023· dissertation· W7133046342 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoCurtin University of Technology
KeywordsLeptonInvariant massStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Invariant (physics)Physics beyond the Standard ModelDetectorStandard deviationTransverse plane
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A search for new resonances in events with at least one isolated charged lepton ($e$ or $\mu$) and two jets is performed using 139 fb$^{−1}$ of $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV proton-proton collision data recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Deviations from a smoothly falling background hypothesis are tested in three- and four-body invariant mass distributions constructed from leptons and jets. The inclusion of leptons in dijet invariant masses provides two main benefits. Firstly, lepton triggers can be used to search for resonance masses starting from 500 GeV, as the transverse momentum thresholds on lepton triggers can be as low as 24 GeV, while inclusive dijet searches are limited to resonance masses greater than 1 TeV due to jet-based triggers which have a minimum jet transverse momentum of about 400 GeV. Secondly, this search in new final states provides sensitivity to new signal models. The search presented in this thesis considers four different search channels in invariant mass distributions composed of two jets and two leptons, as well as two jets plus one lepton where either zero, one or both jets are identified as originating from bottom quarks. The largest deviation between the observed data and the estimated Standard Model background was found in the two jet plus one lepton channel at a invariant mass of 1.3 TeV with a global statistical significance of 1.5 standard deviations. In the absence of a statistically significant deviation from the background estimate, upper exclusion limits are set at a 95\% confidence level in each signal channel on generic Gaussian-shaped resonances with different widths and masses, as well as in the context of four new signal models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→