MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133054669

The Postnatal Effects of Prenatal Cannabinoid Exposure

2023· dissertation· W7133054669 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Megan Drupals

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsCannabidiolCannabinoidOffspringAmygdalaCannabisJuvenileEndocannabinoid systemNeuroanatomyGestation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of prenatal cannabis exposure on offspring is an important clinical and societal concern which has limited evidence. Compounds in the cannabis plant, phytocannabinoids, cross the placental barrier and thus may act on the developing embryo. To address the knowledge gap, here I created and characterized a murine exposure model to explore potential postnatal effects of prenatal exposure to cannabinoids. The model involved administering cannabinoids – the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone and principal phytocannabinoids (−)-trans-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or cannabidiol (CBD) – via subcutaneous injection prior-to and throughout gestation. Herein, I describe effects of these gestational exposures on 1) the behavioural and neuroimaging outcomes in adulthood, and 2) the effects on peripheral immune cell populations. I assessed neuroanatomy in prenatally nabilone, THC, or CBD exposed offspring by magnetic resonance imaging. I found that prenatal nabilone exposure had sex-specific effects on neuroanatomy in juvenile (3-week-old) and adult (9-week-old) offspring. In juvenile mice, the amygdala volume was lower in females and higher in males exposed to nabilone compared to vehicle controls. In adult nabilone-exposed offspring, the basal forebrain was larger in females and smaller in males compared to vehicle controls. In prenatally CBD-exposed offspring, the volume of the arbor vitae of the cerebellum was larger compared to vehicle controls. Prenatal THC did not affect neuroanatomy. I also performed a battery of behaviour tests beginning at the 9-week timepoint in adult THC and CBD-exposed offspring. I found that both compounds produced an anxiolytic phenotype in males in the elevated plus maze. CBD affected novelty exploration in the novel object recognition test in females only. Thus, prenatal THC and CBD exposure produced sex-specific effects on behaviour in adulthood. Using cytometry by time-of-flight, spleen and thymus immune cell populations were quantified at two timepoints in CBD- and THC-exposed offspring. Prenatal THC, but not CBD, affected T cell populations in the neonatal thymus and juvenile spleen. From these results, I conclude that a disturbance in the developmental period caused by exposure to exogenous cannabinoids results in long-term effects to brain and immune systems. These consequences are compound- and sex-specific. Future work should focus on elucidating mechanisms underlying these changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research→French-language works237,207→