MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133060902

Making Time: Sidewalk Labs and the Onto-politics of the Real-time City

2024· dissertation· W7133060902 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nathan Olmstead

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmVisionTemporalitiesIdeologyMeaning (existential)PoliticsIdealizationUnderpinning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Around the world, cities are investing in new technologies to address the challenges they face. Underpinning these investments is a latent enthusiasm for what Rob Kitchin calls ‘the real-time city,’ and the idea that digital technology can create more productive and efficient cities. In fact, enthusiasm for real-time has remained constant even as concerns surrounding smart cities have grown. The meaning and value of real-time within the smart city discourse is nevertheless underexplored, and the interests guiding the pursuit of real-time technologies are unclear. To that end, this project interrogates the discursive politics of the ‘real-time city,’ and the ideas and ideologies that inform contemporary enthusiasm for real-time technologies. Focusing on Sidewalk Toronto, Canada’s most prominent (though ultimately abandoned) foray into smart city development, I position enthusiasm for real-time against the backdrop of what Jacques Derrida calls a ‘metaphysics of presence.’ I argue that real-time technologies promise unprecedented access to, and knowledge of, a pre-existing and objective here and now. Enthusiasm for real-time thus affirms a prophetic (and increasingly privatized) politics, in which those with access to real-time are presumed to know best about the city and its need. In the second half of the project, I argue that this idealization of real-time distracts policymakers from the diverse rhythms that inform, and are engendered by, smart city technologies, as well as the articulative decisions on which these technologies depend. From inherited histories to contingent visions of the future city, digital infrastructures are shaped by broader temporalities that are excluded by an overly narrow emphasis on the here and now. Leveraging Derrida’s notion of ‘spectrality,’ I therefore exchange idealizations of real-time for the compromised temporalities of a more ‘spectral city,’ and a politics of openness and hospitality to that which has so far been excluded from the smart city discourse. The project thus leaves those interested in urban development with the task of ‘making time,’ a creative negotiation with the ghosts that haunt our increasingly digital cities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicSmart Cities and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207