MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133062688

Phenotypic Impact of Genetic Risk Pathways for Alzheimer's Disease

2016· dissertation· W7133062688 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniel Felsky

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2016
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthAlzheimer's SocietyCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental Health Foundation
KeywordsGenePhenotypeNeuropathologyContext (archaeology)Apolipoprotein EMutationGene expressionGenetic variationDiseaseHuman brain
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The contribution of genetic variation to the risk for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease is well-accepted; however, the roles of specific mutations within established risk genes are not clear. Comprehensive datasets with informative in vivo and postmortem biomarkers now offer the opportunity to understand when, where, and how mutations within these genes individually exert their effects on the brain. Moreover, it is known that many of these genes interact at the pathway level, and therefore genetic effects should also be considered in context using gene-gene interaction approaches. I hypothesized that common functional variants modifying established Alzheimer’s risk pathways would demonstrate a) independent effects and b) synergistic effects on human brain structure and other Alzheimer’s biomarkers. First, the Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene ε4 mutation was found to be associated with white matter integrity in an age-dependent manner. Second, mutations within the sortilin-like receptor (SORL1) gene were associated with differences in white matter integrity, SORL1 gene mRNA expression, and amyloid neuropathology that suggested an early genetic risk mechanism beginning as early as childhood. Third, a translocator protein (TSPO) gene variant known to alter TSPO binding characteristics was found to have no direct effects on inflammatory and cerebrovascular brain changes in over 2 300 elderly subjects. Finally, based on evidence from recent human stem cell experiments, RNA sequencing was used to identify a novel interaction of gene variants across the SORL1 gene with the brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism regulating isoform-specific SORL1 expression related to amyloid pathology and brain structural alterations. Altogether, these experiments demonstrate that some genetic modifiers of AD risk pathways are linked either directly via biochemical function or indirectly via the convergence of pathways they influence. These studies have begun to parse the immense heterogeneity of the Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis as well as uncover distinct genetically-defined molecular subtypes of at-risk individuals who should be targeted in future therapeutic trials. Novel interventions designed to engage specific neural circuits or molecular pathways would be of most benefit to the molecular subtypes in which they are most greatly altered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→