Bibliographic record
Abstract
A laboratory device has been designed and built to simulate film splitting in roll coating, which occurs through filament stretching and breakup. At high speeds and for some coatings, the breakup leads to unwanted misting. In our simulator, a fluid sample is initially held between two closely-spaced small disks, and then the top disk is pulled upward at a high, constant rate of acceleration to mimic coating machine conditions. Formation and breakup of the resulting filament are observed using a high-speed video camera, and the images are analyzed by software to obtain the number and size of droplets. Tests with various Newtonian fluids, at a Weber number of 30, show that one droplet forms at low Ohnesorge numbers, and that more and smaller droplets form at Oh numbers above 0.1. Associative polymer solutions, prepared to be weakly-elastic fluids like coating liquids, produced even more and smaller droplets, but only for Ohnesorge numbers in the range of 0.01 to 0.1. Simplified coating formulations, which were both shear thinning and elastic, generated smaller but more droplets than those of equivalent Newtonian fluids and than those of associative polymer solutions which were less elastic. The effects of acceleration, initial film thickness and surface tension, as well as solids content of formulations, are studied as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".