MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133066010

Exploring the Associations of Parenting by Lying with Psychosocial Adjustment, Dishonesty, and Culture

2021· dissertation· W7133066010 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel Marie Jackson

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Animal Learning Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLyingPsychosocialHonestyReligiosityDistressEarly childhood
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parents aim to instill the value of honesty in their children from a young age (Engels et al., 2006). However, parents often use lying as a means of influencing their child’s behavioural and emotional states – a practice which has been referred to as ‘parenting by lying’ (Heyman et al., 2009). To date, limited research has explored the practice of parenting by lying and its associations with lying and psychosocial functioning in children. Thus, the goal of my dissertation is to broaden the existing research on parenting by lying by exploring the associations of this practice with the development of lying and psychosocial functioning in childhood and adulthood. I achieve this through conducting three novel studies that uniquely and significantly contribute to the current understanding of parenting by lying. More specifically, in Chapter 2, I explored the long-term associations of parenting by lying in childhood with lying and psychosocial functioning in a sample of Turkish adults. I found that adults who recalled higher levels of parenting by lying in childhood lied to their parents more and experienced greater psychosocial adjustment difficulties in adulthood, in particular secondary psychopathic traits. In Chapter 3, I discovered novel categories of parenting by lying, as well as identified predictors of parenting by lying within a sample of Singaporean parents. In addition to discovering two new parental lie categories, I found that parents who reported greater religiosity lied less to their children. Lastly, in Chapter 4, I investigated the association of parenting by lying with lying and the expression of psychosocial difficulties in childhood. I found that parents who reported using more parenting by lying strategies had children who lied more, and that children who lied more experienced greater psychosocial adjustment difficulties. Overall, the collective results of my dissertation suggest that the practice of parenting by lying may have short- and long-term negative associations with the development of honesty and psychosocial adjustment. These results can be used to inform parents/caregivers, teachers, and clinicians on the importance of effectively communicating with children in order to promote optimal development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207