MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133071272

Prescriptive Partnerships: Black Mothers of Disabled Children and Educators in Ontario's Public School System

2022· dissertation· W7133071272 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jacqueline Getfield

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisengagement theoryNegotiationCritical race theorySpecial educationPower (physics)Qualitative researchPower structureTruancyCritical theorySchool discipline
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study draws on key teachings and principles of Critical Race Theory to examine the experiences of seven Black mothers as they perform as agents on behalf of their children who are enrolled in the special education environments in elementary schools across the Greater Toronto Area of Ontario, Canada. This qualitative study uses techniques of constructivism and bricolage as it disrupts normalized, hegemonic approaches to parental engagement. The Black mothers’ voices are foregrounded as they share their experiences of engagement with, and disengagement by, members of the in-school team (including educators and health professionals). Critical policy analysis was employed to analyze two Ontario educational policies: (1) parent engagement and (2) special education.This study presents a multi-layered analysis of seven Black mothers as they fight to access special education services; advocate on behalf of their children to get teacher feedback and classwork samples; and negotiate with educators to ensure their children receive timely access to the Ontario curriculum. Notions of power relations between home and school are explored. Black mothers have significantly less power than educators who are all backed by the powerful master legislation, the Education Act of Ontario. This dissertation reveals that educators’ responses to Black students and their parents will vary based upon educator’s values and attitudes, their levels of professionalism, the local school culture as well as the expectations of the district school board and the Ontario Ministry of Education. This study is unique in that through a brief, selective history of Ontario’s general and special education, it investigates the impact of race and racism on Black mothering and mother-work within the special education environment in public elementary schools. Also, by weaving the experiences and perspectives of the seven Black mothers into the analysis of Ontario’s current educational policies, this dissertation shows further how it stands apart: this unique study looks at the role that race and racism play within the discourse of (and discursive practice inherent to) parental engagement within special education environments in elementary public schools in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) of Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0340.011
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicParental Involvement in EducationFrench-language works237,207