MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133071428

Metaplasticity Associated with Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Induced Plasticity

2023· dissertation· W7133071428 on OpenAlexafffund
Yi Rong Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMetaplasticityNeuroplasticityTranscranial magnetic stimulationLong-term potentiationPlasticitySynaptic plasticityExcitatory postsynaptic potentialFacilitation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metaplasticity refers to activity-dependent changes in neural functions governing synaptic plasticity; depotentiation is the reversal of long-term potentiation (LTP) by a subsequent protocol with no effect alone. Theta burst transcranial ultrasound stimulation (tbTUS) is an 80s protocol that induces LTP-like effects lasting 30-60 minutes. It was hypothesized that priming continuous theta burst stimulation with 150 pulses (cTBS150), a subthreshold long-term depression (LTD)-like stimulus, would enhance the excitatory effect of tbTUS due to metaplasticity while subsequent cTBS150 would abolish the effects of tbTUS due to depotentiation. 1) sham cTBS150→real tbTUS (tbTUS only), 2) real cTBS150→sham tbTUS (cTBS only), 3) real cTBS150→real tbTUS (active primed), 4) real tbTUS→real cTBS150 (depotentiation) were tested. Changes in motor-evoked potential amplitude, short-interval intracortical inhibition, long-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, and short-interval intracortical facilitation were measured. Results showed increased plasticity duration with priming cTBS150 and abolished plasticity with subsequent cTBS150 compared to tbTUS only, supporting the hypothesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207