MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133072378

Automated Brain Mapping to Evaluate the Relationship between Neurodegeneration, Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Structural Covariance Network Disruption in Alzheimer's Disease

2016· dissertation· W7133072378 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sean M. Nestor

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2016
Typedissertation
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnectomicsDiseaseNeurodegenerationHuman brainBrain mappingGrey matterCognitionHippocampal formationMagnetic resonance imagingTractography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Humans are currently living longer than any other period in history. However, gains in life expectancy do not portend a commensurate increase in quality of life years, particularly in persons with dementia. This is pertinent as the number of persons suffering from Alzheimerâ s disease (AD) is expected to double to over a million within a generation in Canada. The pathological underpinnings of AD remain unclear but are thought to target large-scale brain systems. It is posited that disease of the brainâ s small blood vessels may contribute to AD progression by disrupting structural brain networks that subserve complex cognitive routines. Therefore, the overarching aim of this dissertation is to determine the contribution of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) versus coexistent neurodegeneration to brain network disruption in AD. The first part of this thesis presents and validates a state-of-the-art automated hippocampal segmentation technique for magnetic resonance imaging to accurately measure neurodegenerative status in mixed disease samples. The second part of this thesis assesses the relationship between hippocampal volume, SVD burden and grey matter cortico- and subneocortico-cortical network hub disruption. Finally, we extend these findings by introducing a method we call covariance-based connectomics to characterize how cortex-wide polysynaptic (grey-white matter) systems are disrupted in relation to SVD and neurodegenerative markers in AD versus age-matched controls. In summary, this thesis presents innovative human brain mapping techniques and the application of these methods to explore the relationship between SVD and AD in vivo. The SVD-signature of network disruption in AD is elucidated, and evidence is presented which supports the idea that SVD is differentially associated with neural network degradation in older adults and persons with mild AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→