MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133083670

Holography and Koszul Duality in Quantum Field Theory

2024· dissertation· W7133083670 on OpenAlexaff
Keyou Zeng

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgebraic structureOperator algebraVertex (graph theory)Duality (order theory)Associative propertyMathematical structureAlgebra over a fieldQuantum field theoryAlgebraic numberLaurent series
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, we investigate mathematical constructions related to holography principle from physics, organized into three main parts. Firstly, we introduce the concept of quadratic duality for chiral algebras, extending the construction from associative algebras. We establish its relationship with the Maurer-Cartan equation, bridging it with physical intuition.Secondly, we define the notion of a vertex operator algebra (VOA) in a (pseudo)-tensor category. Specifically, we study a βγ VOA in the Deligne category. This construction provides a rigorous mathematical definition for the large N vertex algebra relevant to holography. Thirdly, we analyze the structure of the higher dimensional Laurent series, which are analog of the 1d Laurent series C((z)). Here, the derived structure becomes crucial, distinguishing it from the 1d case. We compute the A∞ structure on the cohomology and explore various variations of this model. These A∞/L∞ algebraic structures can define certain (vertex) Poisson algebra. As a consequence of the holography conjecture, the vertex Poisson algebra is isomorphic to the one constructed from the βγ system in the Deligne Category. We provide several checks of this conjecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207