MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133089803

Telehealth for rural kids:Post-disaster recovery

2024· article· en· W7133089803 on OpenAlex
Tracey; id_orcid 0000-0002-7434-1268 Parnell, Tayla Iellamo, Michael; id_orcid 0000-0002-2152-7501 Curtin, Donnah Anderson, Mehdi Rassafiani, Sarah Eagland

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCharles Sturt University Research Output (CRO) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Therapy Practice and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecareTelehealthScale (ratio)Mental healthResilience (materials science)Psychological resilienceTelemedicineProject commissioning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In response to the 2019/2020 Black Summer bushfires in regions of New South Wales (NSW), UNICEF Australia and Royal Far West (RFW) partnered to design and deliver a program to support the wellbeing and resilience of young children and to reduce the likelihood of long-term adverse effects. Experiencing a disaster of this nature can have an ongoing impact on a child. Regional, rural, and remote areas often face limited access to professional support and resources, emphasising the importance of innovative approaches such as telecare.<br/>Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of a telecare program designed and implemented to support the recovery of children impacted by the Black Summer bushfires. <br/><br/>Methods: A total of 135 children in regional, rural, and remote areas of NSW participated in individual occupational therapy, psychology and/or speech pathology telecare sessions. Data determining the effectiveness of the telecare program was collected using several measures including: satisfaction survey, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Goal Attainment Scale (GAS), and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). <br/><br/>Results: Most children who attended telecare sessions indicated they felt listened to, enjoyed the sessions and learned new ways to feel better. COPM outcomes indicated that the children demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in their self-perceived performance and satisfaction of their identified goals. Overall, 86% of children attained or exceeded the pre-telecare goals they set using the GAS by the completion of their telecare sessions. There was a statistically significant improvement in children’s mental health outcomes post-telecare as measured by the SDQ, with a small to medium effect size. <br/><br/>Conclusion: Occupational therapy, psychology and/or speech pathology telecare can be an effective strategy to support children’s mental health, recovery and goal achievement following a disaster such as bushfire. It offers children in geographically remote areas access to professional supports not immediately available in their local communities. <br/>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.190
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it