MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133093707

The will to accountability: Reforming education through standardized literacy testing (Ontario)

2006· dissertation· W7133093707 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brenda L Spencer

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2006
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccountabilityGovernmentalitySubjectificationLiteracyOperationalizationRationalityStandardized test
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I utilize analytic concepts of governmentality (Foucault, 1991a) and methodological approaches of genealogy (Foucault, 1984a) and critical ethnography (Britzman, 2000; Tamboukou Ball, 2003) to attend to the following questions: How has accountability become a rationality for reforming education, and how is it operationalized through the technologies of the OSSLT? How are those who inhabit schools governed---organized, classified, or normalized---by the arrangements, processes, and performances of the OSSLT? How are subjectivities produced under the conditions of this reform, and how do individuals come to understand or 'know' themselves and others in the terms of the test?This study explores how accountability policy has operated discursively to shape the understandings, practices, and social relations of public education in Ontario over the past decade. Specifically, it examines the lived effects of accountability reform by focusing on the school-level practices of the large-scale, standardized Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test (OSSLT). Through an analysis of Ontario policy documents, I examine how the notion of accountability emerged intertextually, how it was solidified in a certain problem-solution formulation, and how it ascended as a rationality for education in Ontario. I detail the ways in which the abstract concept of accountability was realized through multifarious technologies for assembling and implementing Ontario's program for literacy testing. Through a micro-narrative account of how accountability 'worked' in one urban high school, I then focus on the effects of the reform. I show how the OSSLT installed a knowledge-practice cycle of preparation and remediation where certain performances were enacted and certain modes of subjectification were introduced. I argue that subjectivities were both made available and 'made up' through the work of accountability, and I trace how students, teachers, and administrators found it possible, or not, to think and talk about themselves and others in the terms and categories that were provided by the OSSLT. Finally, I argue that the work of the self on the self and others (Foucault, 1988, 1990) involved complicated ways of becoming and 'being' and produced paradoxical inclusion/exclusion effects (Popkewitz, 1998) that contribute to the uneven and inequitable conditions of Ontario's school system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.398 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207