MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133100269

Children’s Effort Exertion and Reasoning Reflect Strategic Sensitivity to Gendered Costs and Benefits

2025· dissertation· W7133100269 on OpenAlexaff
Mia Radovanovic

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPsychology of Social Influence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValue (mathematics)ObedienceCognitionFunction (biology)Energy (signal processing)Action (physics)Differential (mechanical device)Sociocultural evolutionMotivated reasoning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our time and energy are limited: from early in life, we must strategically decide whether and how to exert effort. Children are sensitive to instrumental costs and benefits, expending effort in ways that maximize utility and expecting others to do the same. However, our actions are also embedded within sociocultural contexts, where the value of effort is shaped by not only its ability to achieve our goals but also by how it is perceived by others. Thus, individual differences exist in the social costs and benefits that actions carry as a function of social expectations. In this dissertation, I focus on how gendered expectations shape the ways children exert effort and reason about the effort of others. In Chapter 2, I explore how expectations for obedience (versus independence) influence the effortful strategies children adopt when their firsthand experiences conflict with those of a teacher. Using caregiver-reported gender, I found that girls persisted longer on average in taught solutions (a strategy prioritizing obedience), while boys spent a greater average time exploring their own ideas (a strategy prioritizing independence), aligning with gendered expectations. In Chapter 3, I examine how gendered expectations shape reasoning about others’ effort, revealing that adults and children expect girls to exert emotional and cognitive effort to help others (aligning with expectations of other-orientedness), while expecting boys to exert physical effort (aligning with expectations of agency). Adults also reinforce these patterns through differential requests and undervalue the effort they request from girls, but children only begin to request effort across gendered lines with increasing age, and their tendency to do so relates to their caregivers’ gendered requests. Throughout the present experiments, I vary the gender typicality of the contexts that effort is investigated in, highlighting that social costs and benefits shape behaviour across contexts. Together, these findings expand utility-based accounts of effort by showing that social expectations, especially those shaped by gender, guide both effortful behavior and reasoning, and provide initial evidence to suggest that socialization shapes children’s engagement with effort and contributes to the reproduction of inequities from early in development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicPsychology of Social InfluenceFrench-language works237,207