MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133105339

The Effects of Transmediation on Students' Creativity Through Collaborative Composing

2017· dissertation· W7133105339 on OpenAlexaff
Eunhae Grace Ha

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2017
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicCreativity in Education and Neuroscience
Canadian institutionsCanadian University Music Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreativityMusicalGestureClass (philosophy)AbstractionMode (computer interface)Action (physics)Test (biology)Expression (computer science)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this action research was to investigate the process and the effect of the transmediation (translation of content from one media to another) on students’ creativity. The goal was achieved by focusing on: (a) students’ collaborative strategies of translating non-musical sources to musical compositions; (b) the effects of the level of abstraction of the sources on students’ creative processes and products; and (c) the effects of transmediation on students’ general and domain-specific creativity compared to the general music classes. This study was conducted in a Grade 8 beginner strings’ class of thirteen students. The study was divided into two phases: the teacher taught six classes, then the students were divided into groups of four or five to compose musical pieces through transmediating the given source. Six classes were spent translating verbal, visual, and video sources, with each mode containing one direct and one abstract source. Students were tested three times throughout the study (before and after phase 1, and after phase 2) with two tests on musical and general creativity. The results revealed that students were able to use multiple modes of communication effectively to face the challenge of transmediation: verbal expression to describe and give precise directions; musical sound to demonstrate musical ideas; and gestures to point, demonstrate, and express rejection or acceptance of ideas. Second, when students were working with more abstract sources, the number of interactions significantly increased, and the products demonstrated more complex levels of transmediation. Third, the increase of the test scores was significantly greater after the transmediation unit, suggesting that it had greater positive effects on students’ creativity than the general music classes. Overall, the findings suggest that the right level of transmediation task is effective in fostering students’ domain-specific and general creativity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.462 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceFrench-language works237,207