Science response: recovery potential assessment for yelloweye rockfish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Species at Risk Act (SARA) recommends several actions to be undertaken by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) if an aquatic species is assessed by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) as Threatened, Endangered, or Extirpated. Scientific information on status, threats and limiting factors, and the recovery potential is used to support mitigation planning and actions. This information is typically compiled in a Recovery Potential Assessment (RPA) that is reviewed in a Canadian Science Advice Secretariat process and may be used to support a listing decision. Currently, this species is listed as Threatened by COSEWIC, and Special Concern in Schedule 1 of SARA. There has been a substantial amount of work recently conducted for both the inside and outside Yelloweye Rockfish Designatable Units (DUs). As such, much of the information normally provided in the RPA has already been compiled in reviewed and recently published CSAS documents. In lieu of repeating this information, the RPA elements for which there is new content is provided in this Science Response, and readers are directed to the appropriate document(s) for information within applicable elements described elsewhere. The information provided here largely reflects the Recovery Targets content, with some additional updated information relevant for other RPA elements. This Science Response Report results from the regional peer review of October 11, 2022 on the Recovery Potential Assessment for Yelloweye Rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus) in British Columbia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".