MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133271474

Review of two proposed Trout aquaculture sites in Bay d’Espoir, NL

2025· other· en· W7133271474 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pêches et Océans Canada

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsBayShrimpTroutAquacultureRainbow troutPelagic zoneInvertebrateKrill
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nova Fish Farms Incorporated has submitted applications to the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador to develop and operate two new Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) aquaculture sites at Cape Mark and Collins Head in Bay d’ Espoir, located on the south coast of Newfoundland. Estimates of benthic-Predicted Exposure Zone (PEZ) for both feed waste and feces at each site extend beyond the lease areas, although there is no predicted overlap expected between the two proposed sites. Feed waste and feces can potentially contain bound substances such as medications, if used. Geodiidae sponges and the Northern Cerianthid anemone, both vulnerable marine ecosystem (VME) indicators, were identified within the Collins Head lease area, but these taxonomic identifications are uncertain. No species listed under schedule 1 of Species at Risk Act (SARA) were reported at either of the sites. There are no Ecologically and Biologically Significant Areas (EBSA) that overlap with any portion of the benthic-PEZs or pelagic-PEZs or the lease area for either site. The pelagic-PEZ, predicting the spatial extent across which exposure to a registered pesticide may have an adverse effect, illustrated some overlap between the proposed sites and potential impact to the shoreline adjacent to each site. Shrimp and krill species were observed at both sites. For krill species occupying the pelagic zone, and some species of shrimp using it intermittently, the exposure to bath pesticides, although rarely used, could cause adverse effects. Although escapes from trout aquaculture farms remain possible, reported trout escape events in NL have been few and of low numbers since 2012. Escapees would primarily be expected to disperse to rivers within the proposed South NL-West Designatable Unit (DU) for wild Atlantic Salmon, where significant declines in abundance have occurred. Escapees may also disperse to a portion of rivers in the South NL-East DU. Interbreeding between escaped Rainbow Trout and wild Atlantic Salmon is not expected to occur. However, interactions between them may still result in ecological or indirect genetic impacts on wild Atlantic Salmon populations. While there have been no reports of entanglement of listed Species at Risk in finfish aquaculture gear in the DFO Newfoundland and Labrador Region, aquaculture infrastructure increases the potential for entanglement for some listed Species at Risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du CanadaFrench-language works237,207