MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133275531

National policy on oiled birds and oiled species at risk

2000· other· en· W7133275531 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2000
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWildlifeLegislationCoast guardEndangered speciesWildlife conservationGovernment (linguistics)Service (business)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The context of the Canadian Wildlife Service’s (CWS) role in response to oil spills which affect wildlife is largely set by the legislation and practices of other government agencies. For instance, changes in oil spill response protocols in Canada resulting from amendments to the Canada Shipping Act in 1995 removed the onus of emergency response from the Canadian Coast Guard and placed it with the polluter. Subsequently Response Organisations funded from the bulk oil cargo fee were created to respond to oiling incidents where there is a known polluter. Some response organisations have organised an oiled wildlife response capability, and the Canadian Wildlife Service has the responsibility for licensing of bird responders and rehabilitators under the Migratory Bird Regulations, for ensuring their compliance with permits issued, for monitoring their effectiveness, and ensuring that oiled migratory birds are treated humanely. The Canadian Coast Guard has the responsibility of monitoring an oil spill response and of taking over the response if it is seen not to be appropriate or sufficient. In a comparable role, the Canadian Wildlife Service has the responsibility of taking over a wildlife response if that initiated by a polluter is determined to be inadequate. The Canadian Wildlife Service is charged with the administration of the Migratory Birds Convention Act (MBCA), a responsibility that requires management and conservation of migratory bird populations. There will be an additional responsibility for the federal government under federal endangered species legislation for all listed species at risk under its jurisdiction. The Canada Wildlife Act, also administered by CWS, broadens responsibility providing enabling mechanisms for habitat and all wildlife conservation. The amendments to the Canada Shipping Act have precipitated this re-writing of the CWS 1990 oiled bird policy, but paralleling this administrative change have been changes in the public’s attitudes to oiled wildlife, and increases in our knowledge of the effectiveness of different response strategies. The decision to put resources towards prevention and/or rehabilitation must be done for each oiling event and this policy will gives some guidance in that regard. Throughout Canada, Environment Canada’s emergency response, and the Canadian Wildlife Service’s input to the response, is mediated through the REET (Regional Environmental Emergencies Team). This organization serves to consolidate environmental advice to the responsible party and to co-ordinate aspects of a government response. Because the REET system and the Canada Shipping Act amendments have national scope, it is necessary that the Canadian Wildlife Service have a nationally consistent oiled birds and species at risk response policy. This Policy is consistent with the oil spill response regime that presently prevails in Canada and it replaces Canadian Wildlife Service Policy on Oiled Birds (April 1990).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0100.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada→French-language works237,207→