MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133276315

2025 Assessment of Sea Scallop in SFA 27A (Georges Bank 'a')

2025· other· en· W7133276315 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pêches et Océans Canada

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsScallopBiomass (ecology)EcosystemStock (firearms)Stock assessmentClimate change
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Status The median fully-recruited biomass estimate in 2024 was 13,570 t (meats), with 0.76 probability of being above the upper stock reference (USR) and in the healthy zone. The median recruit biomass estimate in 2024 was 1,391 t, which is below the long-term median (1986–2023) of 3,428 t. In 2024 the estimated proportional exploitation rate (0.18) was below the removal reference (RR) of 0.25. Trends Fully-recruited biomass has fluctuated within the healthy zone since the 2000s. Fully recruited biomass decreased by 56% from 31,095 t in 2023 to 13,570 t in 2024. Recruit biomass fluctuated above the long-term median from 2008 to 2018, and has decreased since the historically high recruitment event in 2009. Recruit biomass was below the long-term median in 2024 and decreased by 72% from 2023. The estimated proportional exploitation rate has fluctuated below the RR since 2006. Exploitation increased in 2024 but was comparable to the past 20 years. The estimated natural mortality rates for both recruit and fully-recruited scallop have increased since 2019. In 2024, the estimated natural mortality of both size classes increased to 0.41, approaching the highest values observed in their respective time series. In 2024, scallop condition declined by 39% compared to 2023 and was below the long-term median. The decline from 2023 to 2024 was the largest decline in scallop condition between subsequent years in the time series. Ecosystem and Climate Change Considerations Research vessel survey data from Canada and the United States suggest that predator abundance, notably sea stars (Asterias spp.) and crabs (Cancer spp.), has increased within areas of known scallop distribution. Aggregations of predators in areas of high scallop density contribute to increases in natural mortality. Observations of significant interannual changes in scallop condition in SFA 27A are likely driven by environmental variability. Stock Advice Based upon preliminary analysis of the 2024 fishery and DFO Maritimes Offshore Scallop survey data, an interim total allowable catch (TAC) of 2,100 t (meats) was set for the 2025 SFA 27A fishery. A catch of 2,100 t would result in an expected 37% decrease in fully-recruited biomass. The probability that a catch of 2,100 t will result in the fully-recruited biomass remaining above the LRP is 0.93 and the probability remaining above the USR is 0.18. Catch of 2,100 t is estimated to result in an exploitation rate of 0.25 which is at the RR (0.25).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du CanadaFrench-language works237,207