MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133277111

Recovery Potential Assessment for 11 Designatable Units of Chinook Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, Part 2 : Elements 12 to 22

2022· other· en· W7133277111 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Lauren Weir, Daniel Doutaz, Michael Arbeider, Kendra R. Holt, Brooke Davis, Catarina Wor, Brittany Jenewein, Kaitlyn Dionne, Marc Labelle, Chuck Parken, Richard Bailey, Antonio Velez‐Espino, Carrie A.‏ Holt

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaMinistry of Education, IndiaMinistry of Environment
KeywordsEndangered speciesThreatened speciesRisk assessmentWildlifeChinook windPopulationLimiting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eleven Designatable Units (DUs) of Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), within the Fraser River were assessed as Threatened or Endangered by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) in 2018, and are currently under consideration for addition to Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA). The first part of the Recovery Potential Assessment (RPA) (Elements 1-11) provided DU descriptions, status updates and an assessment of the threats and factors limiting recovery. This second half provides potential recovery targets, a discussion of mitigation measures, population projections and a recommendation on allowable harm. Survival and recovery targets for each DU were suggested based on Wild Salmon Policy (WSP) benchmarks, with additional requirements about observed percent change in spawners. A projection model was used to assess likely future trajectories and the chances of meeting these targets, however, results are only available for DU2 (LFR Harrison). Despite efforts to produce the required input parameters for the stream-type DUs, significant uncertainties and a considerable lack of data prevented quantitative assessment, and hence these DUs were assessed qualitatively. Results for DU2 (LFR-Harrison) indicate that reaching the survival target under recent conditions is about as likely as not likely (48% chance), while meeting the recovery goal is unlikely (16% chance). Risks imposed by climate change and continued anthropogenic development add additional uncertainty that was only described qualitatively. Based on the quantitative assessment for DU2 (LFR-Harrison) and the qualitative assessment for the remaining DUs, it is recommended that human-induced mortality and other sources of harm identified in the threats assessment should be significantly reduced and in some cases prevented to provide the best chance for these populations to recover.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du CanadaFrench-language works237,207