MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133280140

Science response: groundfish data update 2021

2022· other· en· W7133280140 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pêches et Océans Canada

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundfishStock assessmentStock (firearms)PopulationData sharingSnapshot (computer storage)Discards
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The combination of fshery-dependent data, such as catch and effort, and fshery-independent survey data, such as biomass indices and age compositions, form the backbone of most fsheries stock assessments. Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) manages vast quantities of such data on groundfsh species in British Columbia (BC). However, formal stock assessments are not conducted on an annual basis for most stocks, and so much of these data are not summarized to represent the nature of the data holdings. The groundfsh data synopsis report was developed to provide a snapshot of long-term and recent population and fshing trends, as well as data availability, for all major BC groundfsh species of commercial and conservation interest (Anderson et al. 2019, Anderson et al. 2020). The report was published as a Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Research Document (Anderson et al. 2019) to facilitate review of the methods, with the intent to update the report on a regular schedule. The usefulness of the report depends on its data remaining up-to-date. Since the initial 2019 report, three new years of survey and commercial data have become available, as well as updated stock assessment Research Documents, Science Advisory Reports, and Science Responses. DFO Science Branch has requested an update to the groundfsh data synopsis report including all commercial and survey data available up to the end of 2021. The advice arising from this CSAS Science Response will provide an overview of available groundfsh data and fshing and population trends to inform DFO Science and Fisheries Management staff in stock monitoring and prioritization. This update applies the previously peer-reviewed approach to generate up-to date fgures representing data such as biomass indices, commercial catch, species distribution, and age and length composition data for the 113 species. This Science Response results from the Science Response Process of March 29, 2022 on A data synopsis for British Columbia groundfsh: 2021 update.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0110.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1080.097

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada→French-language works237,207→