MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133286617

2018 Stock Assessment Modelling Framework for 4X5Y Cod

2022· other· en· W7133286617 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yanjun Wang, Fonya Irvine

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStock assessmentStock (firearms)PopulationFishingProjection (relational algebra)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2018 stock assessment modelling framework review for 4X5Y Cod was held on November 6–8, 2018. It was the second of two Maritimes Region of Fisheries and Oceans Canada peer-review meetings for 4X5Y Cod. This meeting was preceded by the Assessment Framework for 4X5Y Atlantic Cod: Part 1 – Review of Data Inputs, held on March 27–28, 2018. This research document summarized the conclusions from the ‘data inputs’ meeting and described the methodologies developed for estimating current stock status, reference points, and short term projection for providing muti-year catch advice. A 10-year, medium-term projection was conducted to evaluate the recovery potential. Guidance on inter-framework review activities, existing data gaps, and research recommendations in the future were documented. Both a Virtual Population Analysis (VPA) model and State-space Assessment Model (SAM), with assumed constant natural mortality (M), were used to demonstrate the fitting problems caused by the unexplained high mortality reflected in the survey and fishery data. To resolve the retrospective pattern and other model fitting issues observed in past 4X5Y Cod stock assessments, the VPA models with random walk in M by different age groups were explored. A VPA model (3MFfirst) was recommended as the new framework model for the 4X5Y Cod stock assessment. There was a clear temporal increasing trend in M on older age groups (ages 5+); it has steadily increased from 0.37 in 1983 to about 1.5 since 2011. The high M estimated in the VPA models could be aliasing fish moving to adjacent areas or deeper waters, under-reported landings, and unreported discards, as well as natural mortality caused by biotic and abiotic factors. For the biomass limit reference points, considering the unstationary natural mortality of ages 5+ Cod, the equilibrium Maximum Sustainble Yield (MSY)-based reference points was considered not approporiate. The Sb50/90 = 22,193 mt was recommended as the biomass limit reference points for 4X5Y Cod. Given the estimated poor stock status, the fishery catch advice would be as low as possible to rebuild this stock. The fishing reference point was not developed. A 10-year projection showed that there would be little chance of stock recovery under high M and low recruitement, even with zero catch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada→French-language works237,207→