MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133286621

Review of six Proposed finfish aqua. sites on the South Coast of NL

2024· other· en· W7133286621 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pêches et Océans Canada

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsCoveBayPelagic zoneBenthic zoneAquacultureFjordBenthosCrustacean
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MOWI Canada East Incorporated submitted applications to the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador to develop and operate six new finfish aquaculture sites for Atlantic Salmon on the south coast of Newfoundland split among three fjords within two proposed aquaculture management areas, Bay de Vieux and Aviron/La Hune Bays. Estimates of benthic-Potential Exposure Zone (PEZ) for feed waste for each site showed no overlap. Estimates of benthic-PEZ for feces overlapped at adjacent sites within the same bay. Feed waste and feces can potentially contain bound substances such as medications. Pelagic-PEZ, which estimates the spatial extent across which exposure to registered pesticides may result in adverse effects, overlaps between sites within the same aquaculture management areas. These pelagic-PEZs extend to water masses beyond the bays and reach shorelines which may impact the shallow areas adjacent to each site. Chemotherapeutant sea lice treatments could affect non-target crustaceans through the exposure of adults in the benthos to in-feed residues, and/or their larval stages through pelagic exposure to pesticides. For primarily pelagic krill species, pesticide exposure might represent a risk at most sites. Treatments that occur at adjacent sites may result in cumulative impacts at sites where benthic and pelagic-PEZs overlap. For the Foots Cove and Shoal Cove sites, high densities of crustaceans that are in close proximity to cage areas might be at a higher risk. Soft corals and sea pens were identified at five of the sites. At Gnat Island, the sea pen Pennatula aculeata was detected in high concentrations adjacent to the proposed cage array. Lack of data on the density, distribution, and effects on these species and habitats in the surrounding area limit understanding of the potential impacts. There are 55 Atlantic Salmon rivers along the southwest coast of Newfoundland. Monitoring data from recent decades suggests that all three monitored rivers in the region have shown evidence of multi-generational population declines, with Bay d’Espoir showing declines exceeding 90%. Widespread hybridization between wild salmon and aquaculture escapees, and resulting genetic changes, have been documented in southern Newfoundland over the past decade. The continued observations of European ancestry in escaped farmed salmon in Atlantic Canada increases the direct genetic risk to wild populations. Empirical data and dispersal modeling analyses showed that for Designatable Unit 4b, the area of the proposed expansion, the number of escapees in the rivers is predicted to increase by 10% under the proposed expansion, with most occurring in White Bear River and Grey River. Ongoing impacts are predicted on both the abundance and genetic character of wild salmon in the region, and the risk of impacts is predicted to increase under the proposed expansion. An increase in aquaculture infrastructure increases the potential for entanglement for some Species at Risk. These include White Shark, Blue Whale, Fin Whale, North Atlantic Right Whale, and Leatherback Sea Turtles which occur in the general area, particularly from spring to autumn. Nonetheless, there are no reports of entanglement of these species in finfish aquaculture gear in the Newfoundland and Labrador Region. Two benthic fecal-PEZs (Denny Island, Gnat Island) minimally overlap (<1 km2) the current South Coast Ecologically and Biologically Significant Area (EBSA). Benthic waste feed PEZs do not overlap this EBSA. The Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) review process for aquaculture siting would greatly benefit from a framework process that refines guidelines for science input.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada→French-language works237,207→