MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133287292

Mitigation measures to reduce the risk of Introduction and spread of aquatic invasive species through shellfish and macroalgal movements

2025· other· en· W7133287292 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. Massé-Beaulne, N. Simard, R. Y. Bernier, C. M. Pearce, T. W. Therriault

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShellfishAquatic ecosystemInvasive speciesAquatic animalEcosystemRange (aeronautics)Marine speciesAquatic environment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) that are introduced or spread to ecosystems beyond their natural range can threaten Canada’s biodiversity, economy, and society. Shellfish and macroalgal movements are considered to be an important vector for the introduction and spread of AIS in marine ecosystems. To date, a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of treatments that could be used in Canada to kill or remove marine AIS from shellfish and macroalgae being moved and their impacts on those species has not been conducted. Thus, a wide variety of treatments are currently in use without national guidance or consistency. A literature review was undertaken to document the effectiveness of existing treatments to kill/remove AIS and their impacts on moved shellfish and macroalgal species. Effective treatments for AIS from different taxonomic groups (tunicates, bivalves, gastropods, crustaceans, sea stars, macroalgae, polychaetes, bryozoans, sponges, hydrozoans) were evaluated and included physical (pressure washing, air drying, freshwater, heat) and chemical (chlorine-based compounds, acetic acid, citric acid, brine, hydrated lime, Virkon®) sprays/immersions or combinations of these. Treatment impacts on moved species (mussels, oysters, scallops, macroalgae) were also evaluated. Numerous physical and chemical treatments were identified as being effective at killing or removing various AIS and several treatment options were also identified that have no/low impacts on moved shellfish species. Very little information was found for cultured macroalgae transfers. Although a few treatment options were applicable to a large number of AIS, no single treatment was found to be applicable to all AIS while maintaining shellfish survival. Given the context-dependency of treatment options, additional research is needed to develop national standards to mitigate AIS movements associated with shellfish and macroalgal movements in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du CanadaFrench-language works237,207