MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133288714

Potential Exposure Zones for Proposed Newfoundland Marine Finfish Salmon Aquaculture Sites : Initial First Order Triage Scoping Calculations and Consistency Comparisons

2023· other· en· W7133288714 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
F. H. Page, S. P. Haigh, M. P. A. O'Flaherty-Sproul

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPelagic zoneBenthic zoneAquacultureCurrent (fluid)First orderRADIUSSink (geography)Fish <Actinopterygii>
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this document, we describe a simple model, the Potential Exposure Zone (PEZ), that estimates the area exposed to discharges (feed, feces, in-feed drugs, and bath pesticides) resulting from finfish aquaculture activities. The PEZ provides an estimate of the spatial scale over which examination of information concerning the presence of species, habitats, and human activities should be examined for interactions of potential concern as part of an initial screening process for Fisheries and Oceans Canada aquaculture site assessments. The PEZ is a circle centred on the cage array with a radius equal to half the length scale of the cage array and a transport distance which is determined from a current speed and a transport time. PEZs are calculated for fourteen proposed Newfoundland marine finfish aquaculture sites. Benthic PEZs for waste feed, feces, and in-feed drugs are calculated using mid-depth current speeds and transport times based on the time required for particles to sink to the seabed. Pelagic PEZs for azamethiphos and hydrogen peroxide are calculated using 15 m sub-surface current speeds and a transport time based on the time required for the treatment dose concentration to dilute to a specified threshold. All calculated PEZs have radii ranging from O(100) to O(1,000) m with the exception of the PEZ associated with well-boat discharges for hydrogen peroxide which has a radius of 0 m since the assumed effective treatment concentration is less than the threshold concentration. Length scales estimated from the predicted deposition areas provided by the proponent were consistent with the length scales of the benthic PEZs estimated using mean current speeds. It should be emphasized that the entire domain within a PEZ is unlikely to be exposed but with proper selection of the input variables (i.e., current speed, sinking rate, depth, dilution rate, and threshold concentration), the PEZs should encompass all exposed areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du CanadaFrench-language works237,207