MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133301962 · doi:10.65521/ijmer.v14i2.1703

Integration of Satellite Remote Sensing and Machine Learning for Pond Water Quality Prediction in Eluru

2025· article· W7133301962 on OpenAlexaff
Dr. Aparitosh Gahankari, Komal Waghade, Aayushi Joshi, Kashish Taklikar, Aachal D. Raut

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal on Mechanical Engineering and Robotics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater qualityRandom forestSatelliteMultispectral imageShortwaveScale (ratio)Cloud coverLand coverAtmospheric correction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aquaculture is essential for addressing global food security, but its sustainable expansion faces significant hurdles—particularly in monitoring water quality. In key aquaculture hubs like Eluru, India, the well-being and output of fishponds hinge on critical factors like dissolved oxygen (DO), pH levels, and ammonia concentrations. Conventional monitoring techniques, which involve labor-intensive manual sampling, are costly, inefficient, and difficult to scale across vast pond networks. To overcome these limitations, this study introduces an innovative solution: a fusion of satellite remote sensing and machine learning designed to deliver scalable, affordable, and near-instantaneous water quality assessments. At the core of this approach is Sentinel-2 multispectral imagery, offering detailed optical data spanning visible, near-infrared (NIR), and shortwave infrared (SWIR) wavelengths. While DO, ammonia, and pH cannot be directly measured by satellites, they can be estimated using spectral indicators such as reflectance values (B2, B3, B4, B8, B11, B12) and water-vegetation indices like NDVI, NDWI, MNDWI, and NDCI. The methodology follows a two-phase process: (i) reconstructing missing satellite data caused by cloud cover or gaps using interpolation and regression techniques to maintain dataset continuity; and (ii) training a Random Forest regression model on historical in-situ measurements alongside satellite-derived metrics to predict DO, ammonia, and pH concurrently. Findings reveal that this combined method effectively compensates for incomplete satellite observations while yielding precise estimates of vital water quality metrics. By facilitating large-scale, routine monitoring of thousands of ponds, the system drastically reduces reliance on manual sampling. This advancement holds promise for bolstering aquaculture welfare programs, enhancing fish health and productivity, and promoting the long-term viability of inland aquaculture operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal on Mechanical Engineering and RoboticsSame topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207