MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133363367 · doi:10.58532/nbennurradc4

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING IN GREEN ORGANIC CHEMISTRY: ADVANCING SUSTAINABLE CATALYSIS, PROCESS OPTIMIZATION, AND MATERIAL INNOVATION

2025· book-chapter· W7133363367 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sudarshan D. Tapsale, Dr. Malhari Chandraharsh Nagtilak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Language
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretabilityProcess (computing)Energy consumptionSustainable developmentProcess integrationApplications of artificial intelligenceEfficient energy useProduction (economics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are revolutionizing green organic chemistry by enabling data-driven optimization of chemical processes that minimize environmental impact. These technologies facilitate prediction of reaction outcomes, design of eco-friendly synthetic pathways, and discovery of sustainable materials, significantly advancing environmentally conscious research. Key applications include reaction optimization, solvent selection, waste reduction, and the development of catalysts and reagents that reduce harmful byproducts and energy consumption. Noteworthy achievements encompass IBM Research’s AI-designed hydrogen production catalyst (2023), improving reaction efficiency; Stanford University’s AI-assisted CO₂ capture technology (2022), lowering industrial emissions; and the University of Edinburgh’s AI model (2023), predicting eco-friendly solvents, decreasing hazardous waste. AI-driven process optimization has enhanced industrial efficiency, exemplified by Pfizer and Merck reducing pharmaceutical energy consumption and the University of Toronto increasing biofuel production efficiency. In materials innovation, AI has enabled MIT’s biodegradable plastics (2023) that decompose faster than conventional polymers and Google DeepMind’s collaboration with Nestlé and Unilever (2024) to develop sustainable packaging. Tesla’s adoption of AI for cobalt-free battery alternatives further demonstrates AI’s contribution to energy sector sustainability. Despite these advancements, challenges persist, including limited high-quality datasets, interpretability of AI models, integration with experimental workflows, and regulatory and ethical concerns. Initiatives such as the European Union’s 2025 GreenTech Initiative promote standardized AI frameworks and open-access databases to overcome these barriers. Looking ahead, integration with quantum computing and nanotechnology promises fully automated, waste-free chemical processes. Through interdisciplinary collaboration and continuous innovation, AI and ML are poised to accelerate green chemistry, fostering a more sustainable and eco-friendly chemical industry

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207