Inhabiting informal spaces in the Caribbean: A Commons-based approach to strengthen the resilience of living places to flood risks.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette communication explore les dynamiques d'urbanisation informelle dans les Caraïbes, notamment dans les ravines vulnérables de l'aire métropolitaine de Port-au-Prince en Haïti. Elle se concentre sur la ravine Tête de l’Eau à Pétion-Ville, où l'urbanisation non planifiée accentue les risques d'inondation et de mouvements de terrain, exacerbés par les changements climatiques. À travers une méthodologie alliant observation hodologique, arpentage de terrain et analyse des transects, la recherche propose une approche alternative aux outils urbanistiques traditionnels. En s'appuyant sur le concept des Communs (Ostrom, Monnin, Dardot et Laval) et leur application aux contextes informels, l'étude postule qu'une conscience des Communs aide à renforcer la résilience communautaire et territoriale. Les résultats attendus incluent la co-construction solidaire de territoires résilients, combinant protection écosystémique, pratiques sociales locales, et hybridation entre vivants humains et non humains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".