The participation through JR's artwork.: Critical approach of the ' Inside Out Project'
Bibliographic record
Abstract
held in 2017 and 2018 in Nice, France: the conference "Framing Street Art" and the seminar "Street Art Europe".Framing artworks made in the streets for -and often with-the public is very problematic.However, frames are central topics in the living forms of art named graffiti and street art.When Banksy's Girl with Balloon was shredded by its big golden frame at Sotheby's London in October 2018, becoming Love Is in the Bin, who was found guilty?What was framed?If spilling over and trespassing are in the genes of graffiti and street art, so are the borders and frames: graffiti and street artworks need them to be able to violate them.The ten chapters of the book, first released as presentations during the conference "Framing Street Art" (2017) and the seminar "Street Art Europe" (2018) all question borderlines, frames and framing.Written by various researchers and artists, young and seasoned, from different countries and cultural backgrounds, and from a wide range of disciplines and activities (Aesthetics, Architecture and Urbanism, Art History, Communication Studies, Contemporary Art, Cultural Studies, English-American Studies, Italian Studies, Philosophy, Psychology), they also address the vexata quaestio of what graffiti and street art are.Beyond terminological dissents among scholars and between the latter and nonacademics, and taking for granted that each contributor frames his/her own definition, the overall conception of graffiti and street art is that of umbrella terms, for their boundaries are quite blurred and constantly changing.According to such a basic definition, we found US-Canadian artist Edward Hillel and French artist Lucas Bernardeschi to fit very well in the event, although their works are not usually labelled as street art.The Homme-sandwich performance that Hillel set up in the end of the meeting (fig. 1) 1 , part of Project 43 which is "always in-situ, always collaborative and always dependent on its reception by and interaction with local audiences for its completion", as he writes, is intrinsically based on the urban environment and the people living there or passing by.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".