MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133568004 · doi:10.18103/mra.v14i2.7277

Phalangeal Fractures Treated by Tendinitaxis: A Narrative Review of Principles, Techniques, and Outcomes

2025· article· W7133568004 on OpenAlex
Shrikant J. Chinchalkar, Kristen MacDonald

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Research Archives · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsHand and Upper Limb Clinic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrative reviewSoft tissueTraction (geology)Reduction (mathematics)Range of motionFixation (population genetics)Tendon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phalangeal fractures are common injuries sustained to the hand which frequently lead to stiffness, malunion, and functional compromise due to the close relationship between bone, tendon, and soft tissues with the digital skeleton. Management strategies vary, from immobilization, to closed reduction and open reduction techniques with the goal to restore bony alignment and eventual range of motion and hand function. It is generally accepted that surgical fixation methods, given the additional disruption of surrounding soft tissues, is associated with increased risk of tendon adhesions and potential reduced range of motion outcomes. Traction of fracture fragments to restore alignment can be achieved externally through skin traction and use of orthoses, internally via fixation apparatus, or a combination of the two with skeletal traction. The restoration of bony alignment is achieved through the principle of tendinotaxis. Tendinotaxis is a principle of fracture reduction that uses tension generated by tendon forces to realign fracture fragments, offering a minimally invasive technique to achieve stable alignment while preserving soft tissue integrity. This narrative review examines the anatomical basis, biomechanics, clinical indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes of tendinotaxis in the management of proximal, middle, and distal phalangeal fractures. Tendinotaxis techniques have shown favorable outcomes in comminuted, intra-articular, and unstable fractures. Evidence suggests that tendinotaxis via traction can effectively restore bony alignment, and minimize surgical soft tissue trauma, restoring normal joint motion. Available literature demonstrates improved range of motion, reduced rates of stiffness, and lower complications as compared with conventional open reduction methods. Further high-quality comparative studies are needed to standardize protocols and define indications. Tendinotaxis remains a valuable technique in carefully selected phalangeal fractures where the preservation of soft tissue and early mobilization are essential to functional recovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.401 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it