Sling Gauze Technique for the Positioning of RAE Tube in Infants Undergoing Head and Neck Surgeries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to maintain anaesthesia with minimal complications, one of the vital steps is securing a stable oral endotracheal tube. The endotracheal tube may be displaced and become unstable due to suctioning, change in the position of the head and patient care. Poor fixation of the endotracheal tube is one of the leading causes of accidental extubation. The ideal endotracheal tube stabilisation method must allow changes in position of the infant during care while simultaneously minimising movement of the tube. The relatively short tracheal length in small children and infants is a major reason why placing the endotracheal tube (ETT) in the proper position may be difficult. The endotracheal tube may migrate cephalad with neck extension and caudally with neck flexion due to changes in the position of the head, such as extension or flexion of the neck. Sometimes, a well secured tube may also cause abnormalities in ventilation due to the dynamic positioning during surgeries on the cranium. Here, we present to you a technique where the oral endotracheal tube fixation at the lips, can be manoeuvred to change its depth of insertion by millimetres by a simple easily available device in the operation theatre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".