Теология и пасторская практика Джона Теннента как типичного проповедника Первого (религиозного) «Великого Пробуждения» в пресвитерианских церквях среднеатлантических колоний Англии во второй четверти XVIII в.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье исследуются теологические представления и пасторская практика пресвитерианского священнослужителя Джона Теннента во время зарождения Первого (религиозного) «Великого Пробуждения» в британской колонии Нью-Джерси во второй четверти XVIII века. Данная тема важна как для понимания региональной специфики «Великого Пробуждения» в колонии, так и для выявления основных механизмов воздействия на аудиторию со стороны пастора, которые впоследствии приводили к «пробуждению» конгрегаций, а после и отдельных областей, охватывая новые территории. В ходе сравнительного анализа источников автору удалось установить, что на Джона Теннента оказали влияние в большей степени проповедник-пиетист Теодор Фрелингхёйзен и в меньшей степени старший брат пастора, Гилберт Теннент. Соприкасаясь с ними в своем служении, Джон Теннент перенимал пиетистские практики — «проповедь ужасов», требование «пробуждения» / «рождения свыше», экспрессивную, часто эмоциональную манеру проповеди, пренебрежение к обрядовой составляющей церкви, странствующую проповедь, требующую выхода за пределы конгрегации, где служил пастор. Усвоенные практики, приводя к положительным результатам («ривайвел» общины), затем, как правило, перенимались другими пасторами, становясь типичными для священнослужителей-«пробужденцев». The article examines theological views and pastoral practices of the Presbyterian minister John Tennent during the dawn of the First (Religious) Great Awakening in the British colony of New Jersey in the second quarter of the 18th century. This topic is important both for understanding the regional specifics of the Great Awakening in the colony and for identifying the key mechanisms of a pastor’s influence on his audience, which later on, led to the “awakening” of communities, and then entire regions, spreading into new territories. Comparative analysis of sources made it possible to find out that John Tennent was much more influenced by the Pietist preacher Theodorus Frelinghuysen and less influenced by his elder brother, Reverend Gilbert Tennent. Interacting with them in his ministry, John Tennent regularly adopted Pietist practices — including the “preaching of terrors”, the demand for “awakening” or “new birth”, an expressive and often emotional preaching style, disregard for the ritual constituent of the church, and itinerant preaching that requires leaving the pastor’s home congregation. Yielding positive results (such as community revival), the adopted practices were typically acquired by other pastors and became characteristic of “revivalist” clergy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".