MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7134178279 · doi:10.4992/pacjpa.89.0_23

Encouraging International Collaborative Research

2025· article· en· W7134178279 on OpenAlexaff
Ryoko Takikawa, Momoka Sunohara, Yuka Ozaki, Mohsen Joshanloo, Igor de Almeida, Yuki Shimizu, Yuri Miyamoto, Saori Tsukamoto, Joonha Park

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)Qualitative researchKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本シンポジウムは,国際共同研究の初心者の方のために,「興味はあるけれども,どこから手をつけたらよいのか?」等の疑問や懸念を解消し,サポートすることを目指します。セッション前半では,パネリストがそれぞれの専門性と経験に基づき,国際共同研究の魅力や留意点を語るとともに,その促進のために何ができるかを議論します。セッション後半では,海外からの大会参加者とJPA会員の交流の機会を設け,新たな共同研究のきっかけづくりの場を提供します。日英バイリンガル開催。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.069
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.128
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0690.128
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0160.009
Scholarly communication0.0200.016
Open science0.0030.038
Research integrity0.0070.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.394 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological AssociationSame topicInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207