Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to a condition on the planning permission for a new housing development at Mitchells Farm, School Lane Wilburton, Cambs, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the developer to undertake the archaeological excavation of the site. A previous archaeological evaluation, carried out by the Cambridge Archaeological Field Unit, demonstrated the survival of features dating to the medieval and post- medieval periods. Three areas were investigated by the Heritage Network. The collected evidence showed that there were four phases of usage on the site. The earliest phase dated to the late Bronze/early Iron Age. The second phase dated to the medieval period, when the study area was sub-divided into plots with ditched boundaries. This boundary alignment appears to have continued into the post-medieval and modern periods. Modern activity relating to the site's use as a farm was also identified in all excavation areas. The data collected from the present site has provided further information concerning the use of land outside the core of the settlement between the medieval and late post-medieval periods. The various classes of data collected have been assessed in line with the regional research framework (Glazebrook, 1997; Brown and Glazebrook, 2000). It is considered that the closer dating of the medieval pottery assemblage from the site may have the potential to contribute to a further understanding of the chronological events on the site. The other artefact assemblages recovered from the present site are all either relatively small or of little archaeological significance. Their abraded and undiagnostic nature means that they have very little potential to contribute to the identified research designs. On this basis no further research has been recommended and it is proposed to publish this material as it stands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.357 | 0.047 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".