MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7134827618 · doi:10.2905/jrc.tgrv490

HTAPv3 mosaic: an emission inventory in support to Hemisperic Transport of Air Pollution

2022· dataset· W7134827618 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fabio Monforti-Ferrario, Edwin Schaaf, Marilena Muntean, Monica Crippa, Efisio Solazzo, Diego Guizzardi, Enrico Pisoni, Manjola Banja, Federico Pagani

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2022
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAir pollutionContext (archaeology)Emission inventoryMosaicAir quality indexPollutantAir pollutants

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The HTAP_v3 mosaic has been developed in the context of the UNECE Air Convention (UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution, link: https://unece.org/page404/env-lrtap) as a community effort to improve the scientific knowledge of the intercontinental transport of air pollution over the Northern Hemisphere (http://htap.org/). It consists of a global mosaic of monthly air pollutant (SO2, NOx, CO, NMVOCs, NH3, PM10, PM2.5, BC, OC) emission gridmaps at 0.1x0.1 degree resolution covering the time series 2000-2018 and all anthropogenic emission sectors, with the exception of Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry. Emission gridmaps have been collected from officially reported data, and specifically from EMEP for Europe (CAMS-REG-v5.1), from the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), REAS for most of the Asian domain, from Japan and CAPPS-KU for Korea. All remaining countries in the world have been covered using EDGARv6.1 air pollutant emission gridmaps. Furthermore, the EDGAR data have been used to complement the officially reported data as gapfilling source in case of missing data for certain sectors, pollutants and years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→