MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7134907622 · doi:10.29313/bcsurp.v5i2.21627

Pemanfaatan Dana Desa dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Desa Wanajaya Kabupaten Garut

2025· article· W7134907622 on OpenAlexaff
Fanny Siti Fatimah, Hilwati Hindersah, Asep Hariyanto

Bibliographic record

VenueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWaste Management and Recycling
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcurementInvestment (military)Rural developmentBeneficiaryDisbursement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Waste management in rural areas remains a pressing challenge, particularly at the village level where facilities, infrastructure, and operational funding are often limited. Wanajaya Village, located in Wanaraja Subdistrict as part of the central service area of Garut Regency, reflects this condition with increasing waste generation yet insufficient management capacity. Findings indicate that Village Funds play a pivotal role in bridging financing gaps, particularly for routine operations, maintenance, and community participation. Meanwhile, district-level budget (APBD) support is still crucial at the initial investment stage, such as the construction of 3R waste collection facilities (TPS 3R) and procurement of major equipment. The synergy between Village Funds and the APBD offers an opportunity to establish a more sustainable, community-based waste management system aligned with regional environmental policy. Consequently, village waste management is not merely a technical issue but also part of a broader sustainable development strategy through strengthening local capacity and village financial governance. Abstrak. Pengelolaan sampah di wilayah perdesaan masih menghadapi tantangan serius, khususnya pada tingkat desa yang memiliki keterbatasan sarana, prasarana, dan dukungan biaya operasional. Desa Wanajaya, Kecamatan Wanaraja, sebagai bagian dari wilayah pelayanan tengah Kabupaten Garut, memperlihatkan kondisi yang serupa, di mana volume timbulan sampah terus meningkat sementara fasilitas pengelolaan belum memadai. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa pemanfaatan Dana Desa dapat menjadi instrumen penting untuk menutup celah pembiayaan, terutama pada aspek operasional rutin, pemeliharaan, serta pemberdayaan masyarakat. Dukungan APBD tetap dibutuhkan, khususnya pada tahap investasi awal seperti pembangunan infrastruktur TPS 3R dan pengadaan sarana utama. Sinergi pendanaan antara Dana Desa dan APBD membuka peluang pengelolaan sampah yang lebih berkelanjutan, berbasis masyarakat, serta sesuai dengan arah kebijakan lingkungan hidup daerah. Dengan demikian, pengelolaan sampah desa tidak hanya terbatas pada upaya teknis, tetapi juga menjadi bagian dari strategi pembangunan berkelanjutan melalui penguatan kapasitas lokal dan tata kelola keuangan desa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional PlanningSame topicWaste Management and RecyclingFrench-language works237,207