MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7134915396 · doi:10.5376/me.2025.16.0003

Laboratory Rearing Techniques of the Ostrinia furnacalis and Their Ap-plication in Bt Toxin Bioassays

2025· article· W7134915396 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rui Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Entomology · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOstrinia furnacalisBioassayToxinVomitoxin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, an artificial population of Asian corn borer ( Ostrinia furnacalis ) was established under laboratory conditions to provide the insect source required for Bt toxin bioassay. The initial insect source was obtained by collecting larvae and pupae from the field. Under the conditions of constant temperature of 26 ℃, relative humidity of 70%~90%, and photoperiod of 10 L: 14 D, the larvae were fed with fresh corn ears every day and their feeding and development processes were observed. It was observed that under laboratory conditions, it takes about 34~37 days for Ostrinia furnacalis to complete a generation. The average generation period of females is 36.2 ± 0.72 days, and that of males is 34.8 ± 0.72 days. The larval stage is 17~19 days, the pupal stage is 7-9 days, and the adult lifespan is 5~7 days. The larvae go through 5 instars, and the width of the head shell and the body length of each instar are significantly different. The investigation found that the feeding sites of larvae of different ages on corn plants were different. The second-instar larvae had a wider feeding range, while the older larvae mostly bored into the inside of the corn stalks to cause damage. In addition, the tolerance of larvae to Bt toxins increased with age. The established laboratory rearing method can efficiently cultivate consecutive generations of Asian corn borer, providing a standardized insect source for Bt toxin bioassay and resistance monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular EntomologySame topicToxin Mechanisms and ImmunotoxinsFrench-language works237,207