Performing on and in the Borderlands: Embodiment, Authority, and Knowledge Production in Scientist and Spiritualist Confrontations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation examines the performances of Spiritualist Mediums and the scientists who sought to debunk them during the late nineteenth/early twentieth centuries in Britain and North America. I use archival sources and performance analysis in order to craft a transhistorical study that deconstructs the power dynamics of spiritual performance, knowledge production, and scientific authority. Specifically, I focus on the embodied Spiritualist performances of the Medium Kathleen Goligher, who expelled ectoplasm – believed to be the physical matter of spirits – out of her vagina. Locating these performances in this specific site of the body allows me to analyse the ways in which various signifiers of femininity and antitheatrical discourse aimed at women came to bear on interpretations of Mediums that cast them as frauds. I compare this against the figure of the “man of science,” and the ways in which the professionalization of science in the latter half of the nineteenth century conflated attributes such as objectivity, disinterestedness, and reason with masculinity. I argue that out of this powerful site of authority emerges the figure of the scientist debunker. By analysing what I call “debunker discourse” I show that contrary to patriarchal cultural narratives that cast men as inherently trustworthy and unaffected, these scientific debunkers engaged in highly theatrical performative practices – and in some cases carried on as what some might call drama queens. I then reframe Spiritualist and debunker performances by placing them in conversation with the politics and aesthetics of twentieth-century feminist vaginal performance art. In doing so, I expand previously articulated genealogies of body art, and make an argument for the debunker-as-critic – figures who, I argue, use debunker rhetorical strategies in their attempts to discredit, regulate, and shut-down these performances. Throughout the dissertation I use the interstitial spaces between chapters to build on and extend the work of Gloria Anzaldúa by developing a poetic theory of the Borderlands, a liminal space that exists between the binaries of science/Spiritualism, male/female, life/death, and performance/life (to name but a few). I argue that it is in their very in-betweenness that the Borderlands hold generative potential – for art, theory, and other modes of political expression. The discomfort and destabilization provided by the Borderlands is generative in its ability to draw attention to, and critique, the problematic and divisive foundations upon which such binaries are constructed, and provide a space from which different futures can be imagined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".