MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135000124

Performing on and in the Borderlands: Embodiment, Authority, and Knowledge Production in Scientist and Spiritualist Confrontations

2025· other· en· W7135000124 on OpenAlexaff
Paula John

Bibliographic record

VenueYorkSpace (York University) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerformative utteranceCraftPerformance studiesNarrativePower (physics)FemininityConversationKnowledge productionCognitive reframingDramaEpisteme
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation examines the performances of Spiritualist Mediums and the scientists who sought to debunk them during the late nineteenth/early twentieth centuries in Britain and North America. I use archival sources and performance analysis in order to craft a transhistorical study that deconstructs the power dynamics of spiritual performance, knowledge production, and scientific authority. Specifically, I focus on the embodied Spiritualist performances of the Medium Kathleen Goligher, who expelled ectoplasm – believed to be the physical matter of spirits – out of her vagina. Locating these performances in this specific site of the body allows me to analyse the ways in which various signifiers of femininity and antitheatrical discourse aimed at women came to bear on interpretations of Mediums that cast them as frauds. I compare this against the figure of the “man of science,” and the ways in which the professionalization of science in the latter half of the nineteenth century conflated attributes such as objectivity, disinterestedness, and reason with masculinity. I argue that out of this powerful site of authority emerges the figure of the scientist debunker. By analysing what I call “debunker discourse” I show that contrary to patriarchal cultural narratives that cast men as inherently trustworthy and unaffected, these scientific debunkers engaged in highly theatrical performative practices – and in some cases carried on as what some might call drama queens. I then reframe Spiritualist and debunker performances by placing them in conversation with the politics and aesthetics of twentieth-century feminist vaginal performance art. In doing so, I expand previously articulated genealogies of body art, and make an argument for the debunker-as-critic – figures who, I argue, use debunker rhetorical strategies in their attempts to discredit, regulate, and shut-down these performances. Throughout the dissertation I use the interstitial spaces between chapters to build on and extend the work of Gloria Anzaldúa by developing a poetic theory of the Borderlands, a liminal space that exists between the binaries of science/Spiritualism, male/female, life/death, and performance/life (to name but a few). I argue that it is in their very in-betweenness that the Borderlands hold generative potential – for art, theory, and other modes of political expression. The discomfort and destabilization provided by the Borderlands is generative in its ability to draw attention to, and critique, the problematic and divisive foundations upon which such binaries are constructed, and provide a space from which different futures can be imagined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.034
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYorkSpace (York University)French-language works237,207