MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135030834 · doi:10.1093/neuped/wuaf001.203

MDB-03. Outcome of Group 4 medulloblastomas of early childhood treated with high dose chemotherapy and craniospinal irradiation sparing approach.

2025· article· en· W7135030834 on OpenAlex
Rose Daynielle Cansanay, Craig Erker, Erin Ratterman, Mary Pat Schlosser, Rebecca Ronsley, Chantel Cacciotti, Sylvia Cheng, Juliette Hukin, Vanan Magimairajan, Natasha Pillay-Smiley, Andrew Cluster, Mohammed AbdelBaki, Ashley Margol, Dolly Aguilera, Claire Mazewski, George Michaiel, Susan Chi, Ralph Salloum, James B. Reinecke, Virginia L. Harrod, Lindsey Hoffman, Akanksha Senapati, Vijay Ramaswamy, Michal Zapotocky, Vicente Santa-Maria Lopez, Kathleen Doris, Martin Mynarek, Stefan Rutkowski, Alvarro Lassaletta, E. Bouffet, Lucie Lafay-Cousin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Pediatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCancerCare ManitobaBC Children's HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreHospital for Sick ChildrenStollery Children's HospitalIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarboplatinMedulloblastomaCohortRadiation therapyRetrospective cohort studyOtotoxicityChemotherapyMedian follow-upMedical record

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Group 4 medulloblastoma (MB) are rare in young children and their outcome when treated with radiation avoidance strategies is unknown. Method This retrospective international cohort included children with molecularly characterized group 4 treated with high-dose chemotherapy(HDC) and CSI sparing approach. Results The cohort includes 38 patients (26M/12F) diagnosed at a median age of 46.4 months (25.9-78). Twenty-four (63.2%) were M0 and 26(68.4%) underwent initial gross total resection. The most common consolidation used was three cycles of HDC (carboplatin, thiotepa) in 76.3% or one cycle of HDC (carboplatin, etoposide, thiotepa) in 21.1%. Twenty patients (52.6%) relapsed at a median time of 24.9 months from diagnosis, providing a 5 years PFS of 40.9%(±9.2%). Patients who underwent 3 cycles of HDC, who received carboplatin and thiotepa or who achieved complete response at treatment completion had a better PFS. High-dose methotrexate during induction and metastatic status did not impact PFS. Relapse was local in 45%. Eighteen patients underwent radiation-based salvage therapy (2 focal, 16 CSI) in intent to cure. The median dose of CSI was 36 Gy (18-36). However, 7(43.7%) patients received CSI dose< 24 Gy. The 5 years post-relapse survival was 60.3% (±14.8%). At median follow-up of 39.9 months from diagnosis, 29 (76.3%) patients were alive, seven died of disease and two of toxicity, leading to 5 years OS of 72.7% (±8.6%). Using the SIOP-Boston scale, grades 2, 3 and 4 ototoxicity were reported in 18.7%, 31.2% and 25%. Mean FSIQ for patients without relapse or evaluated prior relapse was 86.5 (range 69-97; N = 6) and 2 had age appropriate cognitive and intellectual skills. Conclusions HDC and CSI sparing approaches led to a high rate of relapse (52.6%). However, 72.2% patients were salvaged with radiation-based therapy given at a median time of 2 years after initial diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it