Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis explores sustainability in counselling and professional practice through the lens of lived experience, focusing on the impacts of spiritual abuse and religious trauma on personal identity and professional frameworks. Using autoethnography, poetic inquiry, and thematic analysis, the research investigates how practitioners can foster sustainable practices that prevent burnout, promote ethical safety, and disrupt cycles of harm. This work contributes to the growing field of trauma-informed, culturally grounded approaches by examining how sustainability can be reimagined within professional counselling and therapeutic spaces. At the heart of this study is an exploration of spiritual abuse as a barrier to sustainability, disrupting self-care, rest, boundary-setting, and ethical practice. Drawing on Māori and Pacific health models, the thesis redefines healthy relationships, both interpersonal and professional, demonstrating how relational frameworks support sustainability. Through a deeply personal and critically reflective lens, this research examines the "mosaic self", embracing the complexities of identity, bias, and self-awareness as essential to ethical and sustainable professional practice. The thesis also explores grief and loss as transformative forces, framing them as essential companions on the journey of self-discovery and sustainable practice. Concepts of rupture and repair are examined, offering insights into navigating conflict, discerning safe relationships, and fostering interdependence. The research emphasises the interconnectedness of individuals, communities, and leadership, highlighting the delicate balance between connection and solitude in maintaining sustainable engagement with the work. Ultimately, this study presents a framework for sustainable practice, integrating creativity, faith, indigenous values, and trauma-informed methodologies. It offers practical tools for practitioners, charitable organisations, and professional communities seeking to cultivate resilience, longevity, and ethical leadership. The research concludes by underscoring the significance of self-reclamation, identity, and belonging as pillars of sustainability. This study is a call to action for counselling practitioners, organisations, and leaders in therapeutic spaces to embrace a holistic, ethical, and creative approach to professional and personal sustainability. By challenging unsustainable work practices, deconstructing inherited trauma narratives, and fostering relational accountability, this research contributes to the evolution of culturally responsive, ethically sound, and regenerative professional practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".