Da Ottawa a Ginevra: dare priorità alla promozione della salute per creare società del ben-essere
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RIASSUNTO Nel 1986 la Carta di Ottawa per la promozione della salute indicava come si potesse proteggere e migliorare la salute delle persone e delle comunità. La promozione della salute veniva definita come “il processo che rende i cittadini capaci di avere un maggior controllo sulla propria salute al fine di proteggerla e migliorarla”. Trentacinque anni dopo, la 10a Conferenza Globale sulla Promozione della Salute (Conferenza di Ginevra), organizzata dall’OMS e tenutasi online il 13-15 dicembre 2021, ha approvato un documento che segna una ulteriore spinta innovativa in ambito di salute pubblica: la Carta di Ginevra per il Ben-essere. Il suo contenuto aiuta a riposizionare e rafforzare le strategie e programmi di promozione della salute come elemento centrale per uno sviluppo equo e sostenibile. In questo articolo gli autori analizzano come la Carta di Ginevra arricchisca la cornice concettuale inerente alla promozione della salute. Sottolineano l’urgenza per la creazione delle società del ben-essere dando così una chiara direzione strategica per la promozione della salute. Nel commentare la Carta di Ginevra, gli autori sottolineano che il prerequisito per costruire le società del ben-essere si deve basare su un sistema equo di protezione sociale, sull’impegno per i diritti civili e sul riorientamento delle nostre istituzioni. Dal punto di vista strategico affermano l’urgenza di cambiare i criteri esistenti per lo sviluppo economico. Enfatizzano la necessità di cambiamenti decisionali che portino ad una economia del ben-essere, intesa come un modello economico che beneficia le persone ed il pianeta innalzando i livelli di equità e sostenibilità. Concludono quindi affermando che in questo contesto dare priorità alla promozione della salute e alla lotta alle iniquità sociali, creare una cultura di cooperazione a tutti i livelli per la pace e lo sviluppo sano e sostenibile è di fondamentale importanza per la salute e la vita stessa sul nostro pianeta. Key words: Geneva Charter, Well-being economy, inequities, environment, One Health, health promotion SUMMARY In 1986, the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion outlined how the health of individuals and communities could be protected and improved. Health promotion was defined as “the process of enabling people to increase control over, and to improve, their health”. Thirty-five years later, the 10th Global Conference on Health Promotion (Geneva Conference), organized by WHO and held online on 13-15 December 2021, approved a document that marks a further innovative push in the field of public health: the Charter of Geneva for well-being. Its content helps to reposition and strengthen health promotion strategies and programs. Health promotion is maintained as central to equitable and sustainable development. In this article, the authors analyse how the Geneva Charter enriches the conceptual framework related to health promotion. They underline the urgency for the creation of well-being societies, thus giving a clear strategic direction for health promotion. Commenting on the Geneva Charter, the authors underline that the prerequisite for building well-being societies must be based on an equitable system of social protection, a commitment to civil rights and the reorientation and strengthening of our institutions. From a strategic point of view, they affirm the urgency of changing the existing criteria for economic development. In order to pursue well-being societies, they emphasise the need for changes in decision-making. They advocate a well- being economy, based on an economic model that benefits people and the planet by raising levels of equity and sustainability. They therefore conclude by pointing out the importance to prioritise the promotion of health and the fight against social inequities. Hence the authors emphasise the urgency to foster a culture of cooperation at all levels for peace and healthy and sustainable development as being of fundamental importance for health and life itself on our planet. Autore per corrispondenza: ziglioe@gmail.com
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".