A Comparative Analysis of the Idea and Working of Federalism in India with Reference to U.S.A., Canada, Australia, and Switzerland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between a central authority and various constituent units, such as states, provinces, cantons, etc. Federalism allows for diversity and autonomy of the sub-national units, while also maintaining a common national identity and interest. Different countries have adopted different models of federalism, depending on their historical, political, and social contexts. India is a federal republic with a parliamentary system of government. The Constitution of India, adopted in 1950, provides for a division of powers between the Union and the States, with a concurrent list of subjects on which both can legislate. The United States of America is a federal republic with a presidential system of government. The Constitution of the United States, adopted in 1787, establishes a federal system of checks and balances between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the federal government, and the states. The Constitution also grants certain powers and rights to the citizens, such as the Bill of Rights, which limit the authority of the federal government. Canada is a federal parliamentary monarchy with a constitutional system of government. The Constitution Act, 1867, formerly known as the British North America Act, 1867, created a federation of four provinces: Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick. The Constitution Act, 1982, patriated the constitution from the United Kingdom, and added the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees the rights and freedoms of the people. Canada has a bilingual and multicultural society, with two official languages (English and French) and a recognition of the rights of the Aboriginal peoples. Australia is a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy with a Westminster system of government. The Constitution of Australia, adopted in 1901, established a federation of six states and two territories. The Constitution also outlines the roles and responsibilities of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the federal government, and the states. Australia has a common law system, with the High Court of Australia as the final court of appeal. Switzerland is a federal semi-direct democracy with a directorial system of government. The Constitution of Switzerland, adopted in 1848, and revised in 1999, defines Switzerland as a confederation of 26 cantons, which have a high degree of autonomy and sovereignty. The Constitution also provides for a system of direct democracy, in which the people can initiate or reject laws through referendums and popular initiatives. Switzerland has a multilingual and multicultural society, with four official languages (German, French, Italian, and Romansh) and a recognition of the diversity of the cantons.Thispaperwillendeavor to discus s,analyze,andcomparethesystemoffederalismindifferentcountrieswith respect to India and this doctrinal research will focus on the system of governance in the mentionedcountries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".