MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135489255

Using action research to develop an intervention to increase children’s adherence to physiotherapy for cystic fibrosis

2016· article· en· W7135489255 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Emma F. France, Karen Semple, Mark Grindle, Gaylor Hoskins, C. Glasscoe, Chris; id_orcid 0000-0003-0218-4248 Rowland, Kieran; id_orcid 0000-0003-2850-5759 Duncan, Elaine Dhouieb, Steve Cunningham, Eleanor Main, Brian Williams, Suzanne Hagen, Shaun Treweek, Janet Allen, John McGhee, Pat Hoddinott

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of StirlingUniversity of New South WalesNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchUniversity of EdinburghUniversity of AberdeenNewcastle UniversityUniversity College LondonAsthma and Lung UKGlasgow Caledonian UniversityUniversity of the West of ScotlandCystic Fibrosis TrustProgramme Grants for Applied ResearchNorthern Ireland Environment AgencyUniversity of Dundee
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)Psychological interventionGeneral partnershipFocus groupQualitative researchAction researchResearch designAction (physics)Cystic fibrosis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: An action research (AR) approach [1] was used to develop a theoretically informed intervention (a film and action plan) to improve home chest physiotherapy adherence in infants and young children with cystic fibrosis. AR is a participatory, iterative approach characterised by inquiry as a group activity and a partnership between researchers and participants. AR is particularly useful for understanding and resolving complex problems and consequently is increasingly used in developing and refining complex healthcare interventions [2]. Aim: This paper’s aim is to describe the use of AR and explore the suitability of an online medium for developing an audio-visual intervention to inform future intervention development. Methodological discussion: The AR approach involved three iterative phases: theoretical testing, development, and practical testing/ refinement of the intervention. This iterative approach is consistent with the revised MRC framework [3]. We used AR in a novel way, in online interaction. The intervention was co-developed from May 2014 to April 2015 with a specially-recruited online group of 14 parents and 8 clinicians in the United Kingdom. Barriers and solutions to adherence, parents’ preferences for the intervention content and format and for the feasibility study design were explored. Advantages of an online environment for extended AR interactions were its suitability for this geographically-dispersed population, reduced participant burden compared to focus groups, and the ease of sharing multimedia materials. Challenges included lack of researcher control over participants’ response time, a reduction in parents’ interactions over time, difficulties conveying complex information succinctly and in an accessible way, and limits imposed by the textual format of parents’ responses. Conclusion: Despite these challenges, action research can be done online rather than face-toface and the iterative nature of AR was ideally suited to this creative project which resulted in successful intervention development. Recommendations are made for future intervention development using online AR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscovery Research Portal (University of Dundee)Same topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207