MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135520058

The Hunt for Gold and the Road to the Establishment of British Columbia

2025· dissertation· cs· W7135520058 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karolína Libichová

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreatySettlement (finance)PoliticsPresidencyGold rushHuman settlementGovernment (linguistics)World War II
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thesis deals with the historical development of the Canadian province of British Columbia up to its entry into the Canadian Confederation in 1871. The introductory part focuses on the early exploratory voyages that opened the region to European interests, and on the increasing involvement of European powers, especially Great Britain in the area of present-day Vancouver Island and surrounding regions, where the first settlement efforts emerged. The thesis further analyses the events of the War of 1812, which significantly influenced the political and economic development of this borderland area and shaped its relations with neighbouring powers. Special attention is paid to the presidency of James K. Polk, during which efforts to annex British Columbia to the United States intensified. These efforts culminated in the Oregon Treaty of 1846, which established the boundary between British and American territories and created the conditions for the province's subsequent development. The thesis examines how this border supported the dynamic development of the colony, particularly through the Fraser River and Cariboo gold rushes. These gold rushes attracted thousands of prospectors from Europe, China, and other parts of the world, and led to the development of infrastructure such as the Cariboo Wagon...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0280.011
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207