MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135623350

Extending the Glass Chain

2018· other· en· W7135623350 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cath; id_orcid 0000-0002-2702-9087 Keay

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionCreativityVisionGenerative grammarGermanObject (grammar)ArchitectureNexus (standard)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

‘Extending the Glass Chain –100 years on’ was a three-year research project funded by the Leverhulme Trust (£90K), exploring digital manufacturing and collaborative creativity through responses to the methodologies and intent of the 1919 Gläserne Kette (GK) ‘utopian correspondence’, a chain letter between architects that formed the basis of German Expressionist architecture. <br/><br/>Leading up to the centenary in 2019, Keay undertook extensive research at leading archives (Akademie der Kunst Berlin, CCA Montreal, Staatsgalerie Stuttgart, Wenzel Hablik Museum) to analyse original work by GK for evidence that they anticipated today’s generative materials and manufacturing technologies, then gathering an international group of leading practitioners in art and architecture to exchange ideas and responses across disciplinary and geographic boundaries. Keay led them to co-create innovative interdisciplinary artwork for exhibition in the UK and Australia, in which the artist herself produced glass sculptures, relief prints and virtual environments modelled on scans of geological samples. Participants in this contemporary GK were then invited to write pseudonymous accounts in the spirit of the original epistolary correspondence.<br/><br/>The project established that although the GK’s utopian Expressionism has been under-researched compared with rational Modernism, their visions of materials that grow organically anticipates cutting-edge materialism, algorithmic design and generative manufacturing. Their anonymised collaborations are striking antecedents of today’s artists’ collectives and open-source creativity.<br/><br/>Keay is sole editor of a publication on the findings of this project, with a contextualising chapter by Iain Boyd Whyte, the foremost authority on the historic movement. This unique re-examination of the GK’s significance to contemporary material culture and 3D creativity introduces new expressive thinking from Keay and collaborators on innovative ways to create across disciplines in the digital era. It juxtaposes images of startling new physical, lens-based and virtual artworks and speculative architectures with previously unpublished archival drawings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscovery Research Portal (University of Dundee)French-language works237,207