The Comprehensive Approach to Operations:International Perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Comprehensive Approach to security operations was developed over time to deal with the complex, multi-dimensional conflicts of the 1990s and early 21 st century.These were the "new" wars so well described by Mary Kaldor in New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. 1 It is a fairly significant change in both grand strategy and, therefore, military strategy, from the paradigm extant during the Cold War.To fully understand how this new approach evolved, the role of civil-military relations in liberal democracies must be taken into account.This chapter will introduce the concept of civilmilitary relations in both their theoretical and practical aspects and situate the emergence of the Comprehensive Approach within this governance issue.Civil-military relations describe the relationship between civil society as a whole and the military organization established to protect it.Thus, the civilmilitary relationship involves the interaction among three main actors -the people, the government and the military.If there is a general concordance among these three actors, civil-military relations can be described as healthy or relatively tension free; if not, the relationship will be strained, sometimes to the point of crisis. 2 More narrowly, civil-military relations describe the relationship between the civil authority of a given society/nation and its military authority.In this case, the civil authority is to be understood as the elected government responsible to the people and to which the military is subordinated, as well as appointed civilian officials with whom the military must work to execute the government's direction.Although not subordinated to these civilian officials, the fact that these officials represent different jurisdictions (for example, foreign
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".