Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mam part of the content of this paper represent the results and conlusions of a sociological survey which was carried out in the area of the pedestrian zone Anděl in a Prague quarter Smíchov in two phases. The survey was a part of a broader project "Life among the Buildings". The aim of this project was to create a conception of the pedestrian zone, to find its strengths and weaknesses and outline the solutions of possible problems with the participation of public. The whole project was built as a participation one from its beginning which means that the public and the users of the area were involved in the proces s of creation of the system of recommendation for changes. The process covered meeting s with the public, with enterpreneurs and local political authorities. The output of the whole project is the publication "Doporučení pro pěší zónu Anděl" ("Recommendations for the pedestrian zone Anděl"), which is available on the Internet (www.mezibudovami.cz). The first phasc of thc survcy was thc obcrvation which in its two parts - counting and tracing described the area in terms of intensity and directions of movement. The volume of the movement in and out of the area was measured at a11 entry and exit points, the sum total of the entries was c. 160.000 between 7 a.m. and 8 p.m. During the proces s of...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".