Bibliographic record
Abstract
Use of the Fiduciary Fund in Commercial Relations The subject matter of this thesis is the analysis of the possibilities of the Czech fiduciary fund to take part in business in any way or form. The vast body of work is concerning its interpretation and characteristics. To achieve this goal, after a thorough preliminary analysis and selection of the relevant sources, the thesis lays out the most crucial legal questions and areas of interest in which the current legal doctrine is not that much keen on answering. The thesis is divided into an introduction, four parts and a conclusion. After a brief general introduction and an outline of the goals follows a classification of Czech authors of legal doctrine analysing their opinions on the Czech fiduciary fund and their difference of interpretations. The first part is dedicated to commercial and business potential of fiduciary fund based on wide possibilities of use of the trust of the Civil Code of Québec. The extensive second part discusses the relationship between commercial plant and Czech fiduciary fund following the relationship between capital company and Czech fiduciary fund. At the end of the second part the thesis describes the possible ways of operation of the commercial plant with the participation of the Czech fiduciary fund. In the third...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".