MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7135922300

Current issues related to government debt financing

2024· dissertation· cs· W7135922300 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jakub Kuneš

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policies and Political Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDebtCzechGovernment (linguistics)Government debtQuarter (Canadian coin)NegotiationState (computer science)Dimension (graph theory)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The topic of the thesis are issues related to the government debt financing. Nowadays, the issue of the state debt is becoming more and more topical, especially as a result of the hundreds of billions of Czech budget deficits. Moreover, it is an area that affects directly or indirectly every person in the Czechia. It is therefore desirable to address the subject thoroughly, because it is an issue that has a multi-generational dimension and the consequences of today's budget negotiations may cause very unpleasant consequences for future generations. Although the level of Czech debt is relatively low compared with the countries of the European Union, in the fourth quarter of 2022, the Czech Republic became, by a wide margin, the fastest-debting country in the European Union. The thesis is divided into three parts.The first part introduces the reader to the issues and describes the key mechanisms of the functioning of the state budget.It describes what the national debt is, what its causes are and why the national debt has been growing steadily by orders of magnitude higher in recent years than it has been in the past decade. Mandatory and quasi-mandatory expenditures are identified as a major problem for public finances in the Czechia and is given special attention, including a model example that highlights...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicFiscal Policies and Political EconomyFrench-language works237,207